On Madmen last season, an account director told a client that their sales growth was coming from “the negro market”. The client, a maker of television sets, was neither surprised by this information, nor inclined to follow the agency’s seemingly logical recommendation that they market to African-American buyers. Â Acknowledging who really buys their TVs would be bad for their brand image and, presumably, sales. Or so they think. While the example wouldn’t be acceptable now, this type of secret dissonance between how brands represent themselves and market reality is often where the best marketing/advertising ideas are hiding. Take Domino’s, for example. Read the rest of this entry »
Archive for 2010|Yearly archive page
Paying for content, cable TV style.
In Interactive marketing on January 7, 2010 at 3:43 pmThe New York Times needs to get paid for the content they provide online, just like they do in print. Giving it away in exchange for page views and ad revenue doesn’t add up. Not only is it a money-losing proposition, it undercuts the value of the great reporters, experts, essayists and editors who make the Times unique. The dilemma for the Times is that by charging for online access they risk losing traffic, and ad dollars.